Skip to main content

South Korean Public Ready to Call Trump's Bluff

Running Numbers by Karl Friedhoff
Jermaine M. Ralliford
A ROK sailor waves flags in front of an aircraft carrier.

If the president wants to wreck at least ten years of solid South Korean public support for the US-Korea alliance, he is already headed down the right path.

The US and South Korea

The United States and South Korea are currently negotiating host nation support for the 28,500 US troops in the country and negotiations are not going well. The Trump administration has demanded that South Korea double its contribution from $855 million each year, and there is speculation that President Trump will threaten to withdraw those forces if his demands are not met. The South Korean public is largely ready to call the president's bluff.

In a poll fielded in South Korea in late January by RealMeter, a majority of South Koreans (59%) oppose accommodating US demands on increased burden sharing support (26% are in favor). It is especially notable that there are virtually no significant divides across demographic groups. Pluralities—and majorities in most cases—of all ages, regions, ideological leanings, and party affiliations are in opposition to Seoul giving in to US demands. The lone outlier are supporters of Liberty Party Korea, the main conservative opposition party. Even there, 45 percent support giving in to US demands versus 39 percent who oppose.

Question: Should South Korea accommodate US demands to increase the share of defense costs? (%)

    Favor Oppose
Overall   26 59
Age 20s 33 48
30s 25 61
40s 29 61
50s 26 64
60+ 19 58
Region Seoul 28 55
Incheon/Gyeonggi  22 61
Daejon/Chungbuk/Chungnam  34 53
Gwangju/Chonbuk/Chonnam 13 70
Daegu/Gyeongbuk  22 59
Busan/Ulsan/Gyeongnam  35 57
Ideology Progressive 19 70
Mid-Roader 29 62
Conservative 34 50
Party Democratic Party 12 76
Liberty Korea Party 45 39
Bareunmirae 18 60
Justice Party 23 68

In the same survey, respondents were asked about their views if the United States played the “troop reduction or withdrawal card.” This only shifts attitudes slightly. A majority (52%) continue to oppose acquiescing to US demands even if the US threatens troop reductions or withdrawal. Support rises slightly to 31 percent. Again, opposition is largely consistent across age, region, ideological leanings, and party affiliations.

Question: Should South Korea accommodate US demands to increase the share of defense costs if the US plays the troop reduction or withdrawal card? (%)

    Favor Oppose
Overall   31 52
Age 20s 39 41
30s 29 59
40s 34 54
50s 29 56
60+ 25 51
Region Seoul 32 50
Incheon/Gyeonggi  25 57
Daejon/Chungbuk/Chungnam  30 52
Gwangju/Chonbuk/Chonnam 17 61
Daegu/Gyeongbuk  37 38
Busan/Ulsan/Gyeongnam  39 52
Ideology Progressive 13 70
Mid-Roader 34 53
Conservative 50 34
Party Democratic Party 10 71
Liberty Korea Party 57 27
Bareunmirae 49 44
Justice Party 22 73

From the outset of these negotiations, one of the worst possible outcomes was for President Trump to openly threaten a troop reduction or withdrawal if South Korea did not meet his demands. Doing so was widely expected to unite South Koreans across the political spectrum. Now we have data points that suggest this is precisely the case. If the president wants to wreck at least 10 years of solid South Korean public support for the US-Korea alliance, he is already headed down the right path.

Note: This post was updated to clarify question wording.

About the Author
Marshall M. Bouton Fellow for Asia Studies
Council expert Karl Friedhoff
Karl Friedhoff was a Korea Foundation-Mansfield Foundation US-Korea Nexus Scholar and a member of the Mansfield Foundation’s Trilateral Working Group prior to joining the Council. Previously, he was a program officer in the Public Opinion Studies Program at the Asan Institute for Policy Studies based in Seoul, South Korea.
Council expert Karl Friedhoff