Research

Council data indicate Washington has a lot more to learn about the differences in how Americans see the problems we face and US standing in the world.

The Council partnered with New America to explore how Black, Asian, Hispanic, and Native Americans view key issues facing the world today.

Most Americans see military power and security alliances as an effective way to achieve foreign policy goals, but differences emerge about when to deploy troops.

Asian, Hispanic, and Black Americans are more likely to view climate change as a threat than Americans as a whole, data show.

Political affiliation is far more closely associated with immigration policy preferences than race or ethnicity, polling finds.

Public opinion polling in both countries finds agreement on most aspects of the alliance, but not necessarily on how to deal with China.

Survey results reveal how Japanese perceptions of security in East Asia have changed following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Both Millennials and Gen Z are more hesitant than their elders to endorse military approaches to foreign policy.

The Atlas of Impunity, a joint effort of David Miliband, the Eurasia Group, and the Council, comprehensively tracks abuse of power across five key dimensions.

Data suggests that support for a domestic nuclear weapons program is robust, long-standing, and unlikely to dissipate, Karl Friedhoff writes in KEI.