Commentary and Analysis

Proposed cuts risk weakening US industrial competitiveness and clean energy leadership, handing China a strategic advantage in future technologies, Josh Busby and Greg Pollock write.

"With the US abandoning its claim to international climate leadership, Europe must take up the mantle," Greg Pollock and Joshua Busby argue.

Pointing to recent extreme weather events, Joshua Busby makes the case for integrating climate action into national security planning.

"Without changes to US policy, China is likely to be better positioned than the United States to reap the benefits of the global shift toward the clean energy economy," Joshua Busby and Greg Pollock argue.

Arctic conditions, local opposition, and processing and refining challenges make near-term gains unlikely, Emily J. Holland, Joshua Busby, and Morgan Bazilian argue.

"Barring major investments in processing, a new source of raw minerals would do little to address key US vulnerabilities," Joshua Busby, Emily J. Holland, and Morgan D. Bazilian write.

Nonresident Fellow Joshua Busby unpacks what a Trump administration could mean for Korea.

A recent survey offers a look at how experts think a Trump or Harris victory will impact US foreign policy moving forward.

Large majorities of Democratic and Independent foreign policy elites say they are more concerned about internal threats than external ones.

Both foreign policy leaders and the American public back “friendshoring."