I understand what the article is saying. Funny thing is the article actually portrays the killer as an idiot who is against everything. Seems like some reporters and outlets get it right. So it is the same old story, which truth is the truth. You can read whichever you want. It's why we all need multiple sources.
It is unlucky to be superstitious. My posts may be quoted in replies but may not be changed in any way.
What's pretty scary is the MSM has pretty much the same path (sewing malcontent between the races/political affiliations) with the final result of banning firearms. That is why they glorify shooters and not let the shooter pass unknown into anonymity by not mentioning his name.
I remember a guest host on Limbaugh's show that played "Guess the author." The host would read a passage, the caller would have to guess if it came from Al Gore's Earth in the Balance or the Unibomber's manifesto. I guessed right every time because the Unibomber wrote multi-subject run-on sentences. That was the only difference, Al had editors.